In a rare full trial proceeding before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, WHIPgroup prevailed in a trademark opposition on behalf of its client Hybrid Athletics, LLC.
During its trial period, Hybrid offered an abundance of evidence of actual confusion, including live testimony from seven witnesses. In a detailed twenty-two page decision, the Board found Hylete’s stylized “H” mark confusingly similar, stating “we find the evidence of actual confusion to be highly persuasive with respect to our likelihood of confusion analysis.” The Board further stated that “[i]t is especially concerning that individuals with a higher level of awareness of the relevant players in the industry, including CrossFit employees and owners of other gyms, could mistakenly believe that there was relationship between Applicant and Opposer based on the stylized H marks.”
Hylete requested reconsideration of the decision, which the Board quickly denied in a separate ten page opinion.
Infogation Corporation filed a patent infringement lawsuit in EDTX against WHIPgroup client, TomTom International B.V. TomTom International B.V., a Netherlands corporation, was never served papers related to the lawsuit. However, service was attempted on TomTom [Read More…]
Koslow Technologies Corporation (Koslow) was sued in the SDNY in a 100-page complaint seeking over $1B on a contract claim related to gravity water filters which remove viruses. In addition to $1B, One World Filter [Read More…]
January 2, 2025 marks a momentous day for Margo Kirby and her late husband Bruce Kirby. After a nearly 12-year legal battle in federal court, including an appeal to the Second Circuit, a federal judge [Read More…]