new-email-outline

Photographic Design Creates Same Commercial Impression as Applied-for Line Drawing

October, 13th, 2017

By Walter B. Welsh A specimen showing a photographic depiction of a design mark satisfied use requirements for an applied-for line drawing despite apparent visual differences because the differences were inconsequential and did not change the [Read More…]

WHIPgroup Successfully Obtains PTAB Reversal of §§ 101 & 112 Rejections

September, 27th, 2017

WHIPgroup triumphs before Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) in obtaining a pivotal decision that reverses rejections under 35 U.S.C. §§ 101 & 112. The claimed invention is directed to a device and method for [Read More…]

IPR Estoppel – Anything You Say May Be Used Against You In A Court Of Law

September, 26th, 2017

By Michael J. Kosma A Magistrate Judge in the Eastern District of Texas recently issued a report and recommendation finding that a plaintiff’s infringement claims were estopped due to prosecution disclaimer from statements made in [Read More…]

Federal Circuit Allows Computer Memory Patent

September, 19th, 2017

By Andrew P. Siuta In the recent holding in Visual Memory LLC v. NVIDIA Corporation (Fed. Cir. August 15, 2017) the Federal Circuit again addressed the issue of whether a new computer memory system was [Read More…]

District Court Illustrates How Specification Can Help or Hurt Patent Eligibility

September, 11th, 2017

By Stephen Ball At issue was a Motion for Summary Judgment that certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,960,032 (the “‘032 patent”) and RE41,490 (the “‘490 patent”) are patent-ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101. Intellectual [Read More…]

IPR Petitions Collapse For Failure to Identify Structure Corresponding to Means-Plus-Function Claims

September, 8th, 2017

By Benjamin N. Luehrs On August 29, 2017, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or “the Board”) issued a pair of decisions denying institution of inter partes review (IPR) because the petitioner failed to [Read More…]

Federal Circuit Again Considers Whether Preamble Limits Scope of Patent Claim

August, 29th, 2017

By Patrick D. Duplessis In the recent holding in Georgetown Rail v. Holland (Fed. Cir. August 1, 2017), the Federal Circuit again addressed the question of whether a patent claim preamble is limiting. A patent [Read More…]

Don’t Be Fooled By Fake USPTO Notices

August, 22nd, 2017

By Victor P. Lin Filing for a patent or trademark to protect your intellectual property can potentially open you up to scams. Responding to fraudulent notices pretending to be from the United States Patent and [Read More…]

Another PTAB Win for WHIPgroup

August, 21st, 2017

WHIPgroup attorneys successfully appealed rejections for a patent application directed to an endoscope having an improved joining seam on the edge of a window to prevent penetration of moisture into the interior of the endoscope. [Read More…]

© Copyright 2024 Whitmyer IP Group