WHIPgroup attorneys successfully appealed rejections for a patent application directed to an endoscope having an improved joining seam on the edge of a window to prevent penetration of moisture into the interior of the endoscope. In its Appeal briefs, WHIPgroup argued that there would not have been any motivation to make an endoscopic component of a first reference out of a particular material, based on another reference’s teaching of a completely different component made of that material. The Board agreed with WHIPgroup’s arguments, stating “the Examiner has not explained sufficiently how Harley’s teaching regarding suitable materials for an optical system spacer and endoscope insertion tube would have motivated a skilled artisan to make Hibbard’s stainless steel interior tube … of the same Invar™ material as Harley’s spacers.” Having found the Examiner failed to provide evidence or persuasive explanation, the Board reversed all rejections without oral argument.
January 2, 2025 marks a momentous day for Margo Kirby and her late husband Bruce Kirby. After a nearly 12-year legal battle in federal court, including an appeal to the Second Circuit, a federal judge [Read More…]
Join WHIPgroup’s Managing Member, Wes Whitmyer, Jr. on January 16, 2025 at 5:30 as he hosts TechXel Stamford Expert Talks lecture on patents, trademarks and intellectual property topics! All are welcome and encouraged attend this [Read More…]
By Wesley W. Whitmyer, Jr. Koslow Technologies Corporation (Koslow) was sued in the SDNY in a 100-page complaint over a contract claim related to the supply of gravity water filters which remove viruses. One World [Read More…]