WHIPgroup successfully used the USPTO’s new P3 program for an application directed to computer software for alerting an operator of a condition in an industrial system. The application received a Final Office Action that rejected the claims as obvious over multiple prior art references. WHIPgroup argued in the P3 request that the USPTO had failed to cite sufficient motivation for the combination, that the prior art discouraged the combination, and that the combination would not result in the claimed invention in any event. The P3 panel agreed with WHIPgroup’s arguments and the case was subsequently allowed without the need for either an Appeal or a Request for Continued Examination (RCE).
WHIPgroup attorneys successfully appealed an obviousness rejection for a patent application directed to a flexible medical instrument. WHIPgroup argued that one skilled in the art would not appreciate the prior art’s “pinion and rack gears” [Read More…]
By Benjamin N. Luehrs and Hao Zhang Inter Partes Review (IPR) is an effective procedure for invalidating a competitor’s patent whereby a petitioner cites other patents and printed publications (i.e., “prior art”) to argue that [Read More…]
By Hao Zhang and Patrick D. Duplessis U.S. inventors seeking to protect their IP rights worldwide often file foreign patent applications in markets where they conduct business or where they are likely to find infringers [Read More…]