One of the easiest and most strategic ways to build up a patent portfolio is using continuation applications. A continuation application is a “child” application filed during the pendency of a “parent.” There is no limit to the number of continuation applications an applicant can file. So long as the continuation is filed while the parent is still pending it will be entitled to the parent’s priority date. This means that a continuation application filed years after the parent can still be entitled to the parent’s priority date so long as the specification supports its claims.
There are several reasons why you should utilize continuation applications as part of a patent strategy. First, it keeps an application pending so that the claims can be amended to capture competitors that try to design around an issued parent. Competitors may be watching the issuance of your patents and can ascertain the scope of your patent rights, but you may not have the benefit of knowing how they are designing their products to avoid infringement. Having a pending application provides the flexibility to amend claims and thwart efforts by others to design around issued claims.
Second, continuation applications can be less expensive to prosecute and obtain broader protection. The specification and figures are already available from the parent application. Claim drafting may also be significantly less expensive with the benefit of the parent application’s notice of allowance, in which the examiner will often condense the invention down to a point of novelty. A continuation application can focus on this point of novelty and seek broader protection by removing extraneous limitations that are not necessary to overcome the prior art.
Third, continuation applications can get allowed much faster. Generally, they are assigned to the same examiner who is already familiar with the disclosure and the prior art. Accordingly, the examiner may appreciate the more nuanced differences between the claimed invention and the prior art, which results in faster (and cheaper) prosecution.
Fourth, continuation applications can strengthen other patents in the family. If the patent owner becomes aware of new prior art, it can cite it in the continuation application to assure it is reviewed by the examiner. Allowance of the continuation application over that prior art is persuasive evidence that the parent application would similarly have been allowed. A continuation application also provides the ability to use alternative claim terminology, which is also persuasive that the invention is not limited to certain claim constructions. In fact, any issues that come up with a parent application can be addressed with a continuation application, whether it be prior art, claim construction, claim interpretation, issues with prosecution, etc.
Continuation applications are an easy and effective way to build up a patent portfolio. A patent lasts twenty years and its value is often not realized until many years into that term. If there is potential that the patent will have value, a continuation application provides insurance and flexibility to maximize that value.
WHIPgroup is leading counsel for U.S. and international technology companies. We specialize in patent and trademark law.
WHIPGroup previously filed a Motion to Dismiss a patent infringement suit filed against its client TomTom in the Western District of Texas. Rather than opposing WHIPGroup’s motion to dismiss, Plaintiff MDSP Technologies LLC voluntarily dismissed [Read More…]
WHIPgroup succeeded in having anticipation and indefiniteness rejections overturned by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). The claimed invention relates to a sequencing station that manages both sequencing and restacking tasks. The Examiner had [Read More…]
WHIPGroup filed a Motion to Dismiss for improper venue in the Western District of Texas on behalf of its client TomTom North America, Inc. Plaintiff MDSP Technologies LLC alleges that TomTom North America, Inc. infringes [Read More…]