Another P3 Success

WHIPgroup was successful in using the Post-Prosecution Pilot (P3) Program to reopen prosecution for a case directed to a medical manipulator. After receiving a Final Office Action, WHIPgroup used the P3 program to argue that the obviousness rejection was in error because the references taught away from the claimed invention. The P3 Panel found WHIPgroup’s arguments persuasive and prosecution was reopened without the need for an RCE or Appeal.

Product of process infringement

March, 29th, 2024 at 4:21 pm

Categories: Blog

Under U.S. law, anyone who uses a system that is likely to have been made by a patented process, and who does not demonstrate that the system was not made by the patented process, is [Read More…]

Brief Notes on Arbitration v Litigation

February, 20th, 2024 at 1:54 pm

Categories: Blog, News

Recently, WHIPGROUP engaged in an arbitration that included a five day hearing in the City. Here are some thoughts about why arbitration is different (not clearly better or worse) than litigation. Venue The AAA arbitral [Read More…]

WHIPGroup Obtains Dismissal on Behalf of Client Sued for Patent Infringement in the Western District of Texas

September, 6th, 2023 at 11:52 am

Categories: Articles, Blog, News

WHIPGroup previously filed a Motion to Dismiss a patent infringement suit filed against its client TomTom in the Western District of Texas. Rather than opposing WHIPGroup’s motion to dismiss, Plaintiff MDSP Technologies LLC voluntarily dismissed [Read More…]

Tag Cloud

Recommended Articles

Product of process infringement

Brief Notes on Arbitration v Litigation

WHIPGroup Obtains Dismissal on Behalf of Client Sued for Patent Infringement in the Western District of Texas