WHIPgroup was successful in reversing novelty rejections before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). The claimed invention relates to the protection of electrical machines and load against harmful shaft voltages that can cause bearing currents and consequently damage bearings. The Examiner had rejected the independent claims as being anticipated by a single prior art reference. On Appeal, WHIPgroup attorneys disputed the Examiner’s analysis that the reference disclosed each and every claimed feature, such as a step of providing the electrical machine with a first grounding comprising a resonant circuit resonating at the first undesired frequency, wherein the resonant circuit provides a low grounding impedance at the first undesired frequency. WHIPgroup also argued that the Examiner failed to establish inherency of those features missing in the reference. The PTAB agreed and reversed all rejections. Issuance of a patent is expected in due course.
Under U.S. law, anyone who uses a system that is likely to have been made by a patented process, and who does not demonstrate that the system was not made by the patented process, is [Read More…]
Recently, WHIPGROUP engaged in an arbitration that included a five day hearing in the City. Here are some thoughts about why arbitration is different (not clearly better or worse) than litigation. Venue The AAA arbitral [Read More…]
WHIPGroup previously filed a Motion to Dismiss a patent infringement suit filed against its client TomTom in the Western District of Texas. Rather than opposing WHIPGroup’s motion to dismiss, Plaintiff MDSP Technologies LLC voluntarily dismissed [Read More…]