new-email-outline

WHIPgroup Successfully Defends Against A Request For A Temporary Restraining Order And Preliminary Injunction

March, 15th, 2022

WHIPgroup successfully opposed a request for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction brought against its client in the Southern District of New York. Plaintiff sought to enjoin WHIPgroup’s client pending resolution of its [Read More…]

Whitmyer IP Group Earns 2022 Global 100 Award for “Best in IP Litigation – USA”

March, 9th, 2022

Whitmyer IP Group has been recognized as the best IP Litigation Firm in the US for 2022.  The Global 100 award program comprises a unique, proprietary selection process and ranking method. Only the most worthy [Read More…]

WHIPgroup Succeeds Again in Obtaining Allowance with AFCP

February, 15th, 2022

WHIPgroup obtained another Notice of Allowance using the AFCP (After Final Consideration Pilot) Program on patent claims directed to a method of producing a starting material for the manufacture of rare earth magnets. A Final [Read More…]

WHIPgroup Successfully Obtains PTAB Reversal

January, 25th, 2022

WHIPgroup was successful in reversing novelty rejections before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). The claimed invention relates to the protection of electrical machines and load against harmful shaft voltages that can cause bearing [Read More…]

USPTO Announces Deferred Subject Matter Eligibility Response (DSMER) Pilot Program

January, 14th, 2022

The USPTO recently announced a pilot program to explore the effect of allowing applicants to defer responding to subject matter eligibility rejections. Federal Register :: Deferred Subject Matter Eligibility Response Pilot Program. The program is [Read More…]

WHIPgroup Elects Robert D. Keeler and Christopher J. Stankus as Members

January, 4th, 2022

Mr. Keeler is an experienced patent and trademark prosecutor and accomplished litigator. He draws heavily on his background in the electrical, computing, mechanical arts to obtain global patent protection for his clients. Mr. Keeler also [Read More…]

Wesley W. Whitmyer, Jr. Selected as Global Law Experts’ 2022 IP Litigation Representative in Connecticut

December, 15th, 2021

Wesley W. Whitmyer, Jr. was selected as the IP Litigation Representative in Connecticut by Global Law Experts (GLE). GLE is a recommendation service and reference source profiling the leading partners and law firms for all [Read More…]

利用单方面上诉更好的推进专利申请

December, 9th, 2021

作者: Stephen Ball, Hao Zhang, Ph.D 专利申请的目标是获得最广泛的权利要求以阻止竞争对手。但它涉及与专利审查员的谈判,而专利审查员有一个非常不同的目标,试图缩小权利要求让其与现有技术区分开来。美国的专利申请是申请人和专利审查员之间的“文书斗争”。在此来回的过程中,申请人通常会在每个答复中修改权利要求,以求推进专利申请进程而早日获得许可。但是,在通常情况下,申请人只有一次修改的权利要求的机会,而后专利审查员便可以下达最终拒绝从而推动申请人申请继续审查请求(RCE)。专利审查员喜欢 RCE,因为RCE可以增加他们业绩考核的评分。而面对专利审查员的如此拒绝,许多申请人会使用RCE。 此外,根据美国专利商标局的数据,不包括 RCE 的专利申请总待审期(即从专利申请日到申请最终处置日的平均月数)约为 28.6 个月,而包含至少一个 RCE 的专利申请的总待审期为 46.4 个月。因此,提交 RCE 通常意味着漫长的等待。 其实还有RCE代替之法。当对权利要求的覆盖范围的“斗争”出现僵局时,更好的选择是单方面上诉,从而将案件从专利审查员手中转移。一旦任何权利要求被拒绝两次或以上,申请人可以提交上诉通知,然后有两个月的时间提交上诉摘要。上诉摘要提交以后,专利审查员的主管需要审核并同意审查员的审定结果,上诉才会继续进行,此时审查员才对上诉摘要作出答复。 在收到答复以后,申请人有两个月的时间提交答复摘要,答复摘要提交以后案子才将管辖权交给 专利审判及上诉委员会(PTAB)。申请人也可以要求口头听证。PTAB在考虑了摘要和任何口头辩论后会发布其决定,这个决定可能会是全部或部分推翻审查员的判定、同意并确认审查员的判定,或者甚至提出新的拒绝理由。 然而,相当多的上诉没有到达 PTAB。在许多情况下,审查员甚至不提交答复。审查员(或其主管)可能会被上诉摘要中的论点说服并立即批准申请。审查员也可能重新启动审查程序。在任何一种情况下,上诉都成功地消除了未决拒绝并推进申请进程。 上诉最明显的好处是无需进一步缩小权力要求的范围。同样,潜在的起诉历史免责声明也较少。此外,专利期限延长也是一个经常被忽视的好处,因为在等待 PTAB 发布决定的时间都可能被添加到专利期限中。与此形成鲜明对比的是RCE,RCE所花费的时间只会缩短专利期限。 上诉的成功比例也相当不错。据美国专利商标局称数据显示,被全部或部分推翻的案件一般在 40% 左右。在 WHIPgroup,我们的上诉成功率超过 80%,这意味着在五分之四的情况下,审查员被 PTAB 驳回,通常会带来专利批准通知。此外,上诉的费用与低效审查的费用相当,因为它将避免多次“文书斗争”和 RCE。 [Read More…]

Happy Holidays from WHIPgroup!

December, 7th, 2021

© Copyright 2022 Whitmyer IP Group